In Today’s world of & generative AI chatbot, we have witnessed the sudden rise of Open AI’s Chat GPT, which was introduced in November, followed by Bing Chat in February and Google Bard in March. Google Bard and ChatGPT are the two most prominent AI chatbots in 2023. But which one is better? Both offer natural language responses to natural language inputs, using machine learning and millions of data points to craft helpful, informative responses. These AI-powered conversational agents have captivated the world with their ability to engage in natural, human-like conversations. This blog will dive into a head-to-head comparison of Bard and ChatGPT AI chatbot, exploring their features, strengths, and weaknesses.
When it comes to conversational ability, both Bard and ChatGPT shine. They understand user inputs and generate responses that are contextually relevant and coherent. Thanks to the BERT architecture, Bard’s strength lies in its deep language understanding. It can grasp subtle nuances and a good grasp of sentiment analysis, making it well-equipped to handle emotionally charged conversations.
ChatGPT, on the other hand, thrives on generating creative and engaging responses. It has a natural flow to conversations and can develop detailed explanations or creative ideas on various topics. ChatGPT’s strength lies in its versatility, as it can adapt to different conversational styles and handle diverse user inputs.
Google Bard vs Chat GPT:
ChatGPT and Google Bard are similar natural language AI chatbots, meaning they do the same thing. But the two services have some differences and are designed to be used slightly differently.
1. Release Strategies:
One significant distinction between Google Bard and ChatGPT is the difference in their release strategies. Bard was released as a research preview, limiting access to the model. On the other hand, ChatGPT has been made available through various iterations, from GPT-2 to GPT-3.5. It has benefited from OpenAI’s continuous efforts to improve and refine the model based on user feedback.
2. Development and Training:
Development and Training play a crucial role in both AI Chatbot. Google Bard is developed and trained by Google. ChatGPT is designed and taught by Open AI.
3. Size and Capabilities:
Google Bard is currently available in a single version with 1.7 billion parameters. ChatGPT is available in a few versions ranging from 117 million to 6 billion yyyy.
4. Plagiarism Checker:
The plagiarism checker is also a critical difference being considered in both AI chatbots. Google Bard does not support a plagiarism detector, whereas ChatGPT contains a built-in plagiarism checker (AI Text Classifier)
5. Data Responses:
Google Bard generates text-only responses using data generated until 2021, whereas on the other side, ChatGPT, along with standard search results, also generates real-time answers.
When connecting to the Google Suite, Google Bard will produce the most recent and superior information. In contrast, on the other side, for finding new Internet information, ChatGPT will be deployed as a GPT4 model with Microsoft Bing.
7. Privacy and Safety:
Privacy and safety are also important considerations in the AI chatbot landscape. OpenAI has proactively implemented safety measures for ChatGPT, leveraging techniques like reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to reduce harmful and biased outputs. Google has also taken steps to address potential issues in Bard, but as the model is still in its research preview stage, its safety measures are continually being refined.
In terms of availability, ChatGPT has an edge over Bard. OpenAI has provided APIs and tools to allow developers to integrate ChatGPT into their applications, opening up many possibilities. Being in the research preview phase, Bard has limited availability, and it remains to be seen how Google plans to make it accessible to a broader user base.
9. Interaction with Humans:
Bard’s deep language understanding, sentiment analysis, and emotional intelligence make it a formidable contender. It can grasp the nuances of human conversation and handle emotionally charged interactions effectively. On the other hand, ChatGPT shines in generating creative and engaging responses. Its versatility and ability to provide detailed explanations make it a valuable companion for various conversational scenarios.
Both Bard and ChatGPT have their limitations as well. Bard may need help with generating long, informative responses at times. While it excels in understanding language, it may need to improve when providing extensive and detailed explanations. On the other hand, ChatGPT, despite its creative prowess, may occasionally produce factually incorrect responses. This is due to the challenges of Training on vast internet datasets, which can contain inaccuracies or biased information.
The Bard vs. ChatGPT showdown showcases the remarkable capabilities of AI chatbots and the progress made in natural language understanding. While Bard excels in language comprehension and emotional intelligence, ChatGPT thrives in generating creative and contextually relevant responses. Each model’s release strategies, limitations, and safety considerations add further dimensions to the comparison. Ultimately, the choice between Bard and ChatGPT depends on specific use cases and the desired strengths of conversational AI applications. Both models contribute significantly to advancing the field of AI chatbots and pushing the boundaries of human-like interactions.